Special Report:Global Financial
Crisis
BEIJING, Jan. 7 (Chinese media) -- A strange view has
emerged recently from some U.S. government and economic circles, which says high
savings in emerging markets such as China and oil exporting countries sowed the
seeds of a global credit bubble, whose bursting led to the current global
financial crisis.
The statement is both irresponsible and untenable.
The advocates of this view claim that different
countries have different saving and investment tendencies, resulting in
imbalances in the world economy.
They also say the emerging markets have exerted
downward pressure on investment yields in recent years at a time of low
inflation and booming trade and capital flows, driving investors in developed
economies to turn to riskier investments.
First, the statement has an apparent logical
shortcoming. High savings in emerging markets do not mean consumers and
investors in developed economies can borrow money from them without misgivings.
More importantly, the high savings rate in emerging
markets is not a reason for developed countries to loosen financial regulation
and look on arms folded as financial institutions develop new derivatives and
let financial bubbles balloon.
For the Chinese, the habit of saving originates from
their long-time culture and tradition and the habit is also seen as part of
their cherished virtues of diligence and thrift.
Furthermore, previous outbreaks of world and regional
financial crises have proven that Chinese savings have no causal relationship
with the crisis.
The reasons for the current financial crisis lie in
excessive consumption, high indebtedness, improper macroeconomic policies and
lack of financial regulation, analysts say.
The United States should have recognized that
borrowing from abroad for consumption and deficit spending at home was not a
formula for economic success, the New York Times cited economists as saying.
Although the problem is widely recognized, Americans
are likely to become more addicted than ever to borrowing foreign money to
finance record government spending to revive the broken economy, they warned.
Some experts have also referred to the lack of ethics
in the financial system as they tried to find out the causes for the crisis.
"We don't just need a financial bailout; we need an
ethical bailout," wrote columnist and Pulitzer Prize winner Thomas Friedman in
the New York Times.
"We need to re-establish the core balance between our
markets, ethics and regulations. I don't want to kill the animal spirits that
necessarily drive capitalism -- but I don't want to be eaten by them either," he
said.
In a word, politicians and economists in the United
States should stop trying to find reasons for the crisis outside U.S. borders.
Some analysts say that the comment about high savings triggering the financial
crisis is just an excuse for all the real reasons for the problem.
The urgent task for the United States, the world's
biggest and most important economy, is not to shirk its responsibilities, but
find solutions for the crisis and realize balanced economic growth.
To achieve these goals, it should accelerate domestic
adjustment, reasonably enhance the level of saving, reduce trade and financial
deficit and properly deal with the relationship between risks and profits as
well as regulation and innovation.
In recent years, the International Monetary Fund has
issued warnings on the imbalance of the global economy and the Group of Seven
industrialized nations have often stated they are concerned over the imbalance,
but the statements were not followed by any action.
The financial crisis has not yet hit its bottom and
its impacts on the real economy are deepening. The international community needs
to act together to curb the spread of the crisis and major economies should
shoulder their responsibility by adopting proper economic policies and
stabilizing their own and international financial markets instead of looking for
someone outside to blame.
U.S. blame game cannot change facts of financial crisis

No comments:
Post a Comment